About Me

Name: Longplay
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Eric Holder, Rascism and Grade Inflation

By now most of us have heard about Attorney General Holder's rascist comments.  They're all over the airwaves and the blogs, including this one from the great Michelle Malkin.  While it's obvious who's the real coward and rascist in this, I want to look at this from another angle, that it serves as an example of something the Left has pushed in all areas of society, namely "grade inflation".
 
Usually by grade inflation we mean the liberal educational ploy of lowering the bar on grades to make it appear that more students are achieving, and as a side-benefit, to heighten the self-esteem of both the teacher and pupil.  This is certainly a problem and just as certainly one promoted by Leftist "educational" theory and practice.  But this concept can also increasingly applied to the practice of inflating oneself, also most often seen in left-leaners.
 
Teaachers can not anymore be merely purveyors of the understanding of math, science, history, and literature anymore.  Instead they must be therapists for our children, leading them into the adult years before their time.  I faced this head-on in a Madison, Wisconsin, PTA meeting where an excited young third-grade teacher gushed over how exciting it was to discuss with her young males boys how exciting it was that they were  finding they had hair "in new places".  This was in a school that refused to have students memorize multiplication tables.
 
Judges cannot just be judges anymore, applying the law as given to them, by those whose job it is to make law.  No, they must be legislators, and more than that, must be legislators and transformers not just of their defined jurisdiction, but of the world, and often invoking international law as precedent.
 
Presidents can not just be presidents anymore, running the machinery of the state as outlined in the Constitution.  They must be saviors of the world, raisers of oceans.  Does anyone think that if Mr. Obama was the first President, he would have stepped down after his term had ended?
 
And now we have Eric Holder, the Attoney General, inflating himself into national scold - or worse.  Since when has that office been used as a bully pulpit?
 
And what exactly is he threatening to do that wouldn't be beyond the bounds of his designated power?  To force racial desegregation in our neighborhoods will he somehow and begin forcing people from their homes - and this with no law written to allow it? 
 
Does he intend to organize, as part Obama's suggested civilian national security force,  a Federal Bureau of Thought Police? 
 
Will he decide, in retaliation for the supposed crime of police stopping someone for "driving while black", to begin arresting people for "living while white"?
 
But then I suppose this should be expected from a member of the gang (literally) that thinks the Supreme Court should "break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers" in the Constitution. 
 
The job of Attorney General?  Why, it's powers are just what I say they are.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama and The High Road to Revolution

In a statement that reveals one of the key strategies of the Obama administration – and indeed of the Left as a whole, Arne Duncan, Obama's new secretary of education, recently defended the inclusion of “education” funding in the “stimulus” bill by stating that improvement in education is the only long-term stimulus.  

As Nicholas Gramsci maintained (as Rush so astutely pointed out in his first book so many years ago) and as Obama's close associate William Ayres (who surely knows the new secretary well) came to realize, getting control of the minds of the young is the surest way to underpin a revolution.

Since the radicals of the sixties “grew up” and melded into the woodwork of our education system, this process has already been moving inexorably ahead for decades, and the results can already be seen in our historically and morally uneducated young who voted in droves for Obama.  The Left now has the power to crush the opposition that has struggled against it all these years and complete its hold on the the education system, guaranteeing its power far into the future.  And power, not an electorate educated to "stimlate the economy" is indeed the goal.  This may not be secreatary Duncan's personal goal, but then again the Left has always employed useful idiots. 

The process is a slow one because it grows with the growth of generations and because its workings must be subtle and not attract attention. Changing the U.S. internally is Obama and the Left's primary goal. The goal of their foreign policy will be to do what has to be done to keep power at home, even at the cost of sacrificing his sympathy for Leftist regimes by making war.
Once America is secured for the Left, then it can unite with the world Left. With the help of an incompetent and gullible media, the administration will distract the electorate with seemingly conservative ideas here and there, and with flowery and vague platitudes, all the while plodding towards their long-term goal.

I am reminded of a favorite line uttered by Tom Selleck in the movie “High Road to China” - “The ox is slow, but the earth is patient.” This could easily be paraphrased to capture the Obama/Left philosophy and resolve: “Revolution is slow, but the left is patient.”

Some parting comments.

Will the Leftist legislators in the House and Senate show the same patience, or will they give the game away in their eagerness?

Is the Right also patient and steadfast, or has it given up?

If the Right will not be a force to confront Obama's Left, there is another force at work in the world that also has great patience to achieve its goals: “Jihad is slow, but Islam is Patient”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Secretary of "Education"?

Investors Business Daily addresses William Ayers' continued radicallism, especially regarding his focus on "education" (read "indoctrination").

One of the reasons I think Obama cannot "fully repudiate him" is that he quite likely has an agreement with Ayers, who after all held his coming-out party, promising him the position of Secretary of Education. 

Or maybe the head of Obama's "civilian national security force". 

Or both. 

Or maybe it's the same thing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »