About Me

Name: Longplay
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama the Mutt: Beyond Race?

 This from the AP article "'Mutts like me' - Obama shows ease discussing race":
'WASHINGTON – It popped out casually, a throwaway line as he talked to reporters about finding the right puppy for his young daughters.  But with just three offhanded words in his first news conference as president-elect, Barack Obama reminded everyone how thoroughly different his administration — and inevitably, this country — will be.  "Mutts like me"  '
"Just popped out"?  Yeah, right.  Everything Obama does is calculated.  I wouldn't be surprised to find the line's in his regular repertoire and that he's used it more than once before.
 
The title of the article claims that this comment shows Obama is at "ease discussing race".  No, it shows that he can't stop discussing and thinking about race.  If he were truly "beyond race" he wouldn't have said it.  And this context wasn't a "discussion" either.
 
But, though the author didn't intend it this way, he was correct in saying that this does indeed start to tell us how "thoroughly different" "the country - will be".  And not in a good way.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spreading the Wealth to WalMart

The lead-n line in Investor's Business Daily's "Soviet Unions" reads:
 
"Economy: Wal-Mart expects a "blockbuster" holiday season, but with Democrats in full control of the levers of government in Washington, this might be its last."

They're definitely on to something here.  Since the market took a nosedive I've been infected with a "what-the-H___" attitude and have made several purchases that are very out of the ordinary for me.  Now this morning I see an upcoming one-day sale at WalMart with some great prices on laptops.  I've been wanting to one for my mom so we can keep in touch more and share photos and this just may be the chance.
 
I've been assuaging my guilt and justifying the purchases by telling myself I'm helping to "spread the wealth".  But at least I'm doing it voluntarily.  Pretty soon BO will be forcing me to buy computers for someone else's relatives.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

But Gays Do Have Marriage Rights ...

"... Even as the last votes were being counted in California, the American Civil Liberties Union and other opponents of the ban filed a challenge with the state Supreme Court. They contended that California's ballot cannot be used to undermine one group's access to rights enjoyed by other citizens."
 
But don't gays already have the same rights as those "other citizens"?  A heterosexual can legally marry someone of the opposite biological sex and a gay person is free to so the same.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bringing "Color" to the GOP

On my drive home tonight I was listening to Michael Medved's radio show. in which he cited statistics about the election's voting patterns by race and ethnicity. 

The stats were pretty dismal and Medved insisted that the GOP must find a way to bring these people in, a point made over and over in most election cycles.  I happen to agree that should indeed be a goal, especially considering demographic trends (and the fact that it is just plain good for them).

I was frustrated, however, that Medved offered no recommendations on how to go about this important and daunting task.

The prevailing GOP strategy has always been the "Democrat-Lite" "me- too but less" approach, which obviously hasn't worked.  Just as you can't be half-socialist, you can't be half-liberal.  Voters intrigued at all by liberalism want the real thing. 

Conservatives need to have a serious and honest discussion of questions such as:

How do you reach blacks who will not listen to black people such as Walter Williams, Ward Connerly, Michael Steele, Shelby Steele, Star Parker, or even Bill Cosby, but will listen to Al Sharpton, Michael Pfleger, and Louis Farakhan?  The first group (on our side) didn't come into the fold attracted by the by the "me-too" approach.  How did they come to understand?  We should ask them. 

In his early years, when Jesse Jackson urged the black community to pull itself up by its own bootstraps, he quickly learned they did not want to hear that message.  To continue making a living, he switched back to playing the greivance game, and the black community has, by and large, downed that kool-aid ever since.

So how do you reach black voters who will vote for white liberals whose policies have destroyed their communities over the last 50 years, before they would vote for a black conservative?  I strongly believe that if a black conservative, even one as hip-sounding as Michael Steele, had been  on the GOP ticket, blacks would still have pulled the Democrat lever.

How do you pull in Hispanics when they won't even vote for John McCain, who went totally against the GOP base on illegal immigration and pandered to race-centered groups such as La Raza?

And how do you persuade such people that conservatism is in their own best interest and bring them into the party when, by the time they are of an age to be reasoned with, their formative years have been spent being indoctrinated with leftist ideas and hate for America in an education system (and in some churches) soon to be under control by those sharing the "education" theories of William Ayres?

And lastly, how can this be done without compromising basic conservative principles?
 
If you can't do the latter, what's the use of the former?
 
Or are we perhaps relegated to waiting for the realization to set in that, having a man "of color" in the White House hasn't changed a thing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wimpy "Graciousness"

Enough of pundits masking their wimpiness in defeat as graciousness (NRO and even on Hugh Hewitt). 
 
That's what got us where we are now.
 
Enough of "my friend across the aisle".  They are not our friends.
 
Enough of gushing over the country's "achievement" in electing a black man.  Electing a bad black man is not un-racsist, it's electing a bad man.
 
Enough of claiming Obama ran a "good" campaign instead of a corrupt and dishonest, and law-breaking one.
 
When the racists Wright and Farakhan, the tyrants Castro and Chavez, the mullahs in Iran, the terrorists in Hamas, their friend Mr. Khalidi, Osama Bin Ladin, and the homegrown killers Bill Ayres and Bernadine Dohrn are all smiling and partying, I for one, am not!
 
As with William Jefferson Clinton, Barrack Hussein Obama is not my President.
 
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.  And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
 
Why the beauty of the very system we Republicans are pledged to restore and revitalize, the beauty of this Federal system of ours is in its reconciliation of diversity with unity.  We must not see malice in honest differences of opinion, and no matter how great, so long as they are not inconsistent with the pledges we have given to each other in and through our Constitution." 

Barry Goldwater, 1964
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Charlie Gibson Should Have Followed Up ...

Concerning Charlie Gibson's exchange with Barack Obama on his donations, as reported by Greg Pollowitz on NRO's The Corner, why didn't Charlie follow up, as he would have done with a Republican, with this:
 
"Senator Obama, you have ridiculed John McCain for not knowing how to use a computer.  Can you explain why you and your staff placed none of the standard security filters, used by all online payment systems, including those used by the GOP, on your donation website, allowing anonymous donations?  Obviously, having those filters would have allowed you to list those proud 3.1 million supporters.  That's what computers are for.  Equally obviously, not filtering donations opens to door to multiple donations from a single source, and even from foreign sources - in short, massive fraudulent and illegal donations.  Senator Obama, do you know how to use a computer, or perhaps you do, and this is just how you choose to use it?"
 
Why not ask?  Because they really are in the tank, even when they only feint to the right.
 
Paul Ashley
Wheaton, IL
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama in Crisis II: Melanie Phillips in Agreement


Echoing what I said in last week's Obama in Crisis: Weakness or Supportive?, Melanie Phillips spells out clearly Obama's support of our country's enemies, and his disdain for America:
 
 
The only thing she doesn't mention is that his support for and agreement with our enemies extends into the Western as well as the Eastern Hemisphere - meaning Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Real Heroes, Fake Heroes

Ironically, the courage and intestinal fortitude displayed by Spc Joseph Gibson as told in last Firday's "Profiles of Valor" section in the great Patriot Post, would be seen as savage behavior by many, and perhaps most, of the liberal persuasion.  Those same people revel each weeknight watching and cheering actors pretending to do violence to "bad guys" and sometimes, cynically, even to "good guys".

It is even more ironic (and moronic) that many of those actors look down on people like Spc Gibson as much or more than do their viewers.
 
 
"Profiles of valor: USA Spc Gibson

United States Army Specialist Joseph Gibson of the 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, was on a mission to find and eliminate terrorists in Iraq in April 2008. Gibson and his fellow Rangers were being transported by helicopter. The chopper touched down at night and the soldiers disembarked, only to come under immediate enemy fire. One Ranger received a life-threatening wound in the firefight and Gibson helped navigate him over an uneven field filled with irrigation ditches to safety.

That’s when the fight got interesting. The Rangers continued with their mission, clearing a field with tall grass and canals near the helicopter’s landing zone. As Gibson walked through the field in the dark, he stepped on a terrorist hiding in a ditch. He took another step forward before turning to see what he had stepped on. The jihadi then moved to kill him and as many other Rangers as possible, but Gibson grabbed the terrorist’s rifle muzzle as he opened fire. Gibson wrestled him to the ground, stripping the enemy of his weapon, but the jihadi disarmed Gibson as well. Ferocious hand-to-hand combat ensued. The terrorist then reached for the detonator to his suicide vest and screamed “bomb!” in English. To put it simply, Gibson beat the jihadi unconscious. Then, “I got my weapon into his stomach and fired,” Gibson said. “He came back to consciousness after that, [but] I knew I got him. I stood up and neutralized him.” For his outstanding courage under fire and the daring rescue of his fellow Ranger, Spc Gibson was awarded the Silver Star. "

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election Season "Hate Crimes"?

How long will it be until we find out which of these election season "rascist hate crimes" are, as is most common, actually hoaxes perpetrated by the supposed "victim"?
 
One such just happened near here recently when a Muslim college student claimed she was assaulted in a women's room by a man who implied he was doing it because of her faith.  Of course everyone was "outraged".  But now a peep was heard when it was quietly reported that the incident hadn't even happened.  I didn't believe it the first time I heeard the report.
 
My bet is that these election incidents, like the tale above, will never be followed up on.  But the initial charges will turn up again and again in the "new history" books and PBS "history" videos along with those about Bush's stealing of the 2002 election.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama in Crisis: Weak or Supportive?

In his excellent NRO article "Right You Are, Joe", Pete Hegseth critiques Senator Biden's comments about an Obama administration's having to face an international crisis very early on.  I've read several articles discussing Biden's comments and all seem to focus on Barack's perceived weakness as encouraging our enemies to provocative action.  Indeed, Mr. Hegseth's article is subtitled "America's enemies will see Obama as weak".

I think it's more that, and worse.  I worry that Senator Obama actually agrees with the goals of some of those enemies.  After all, Hamas and Hugo Chavez aren't attracted to the idea of an Obama administration merely because he's weak.  It is quite possible that they believe Obama shares their ideals.  They may be incorrect in that belief, but Obama's ties to such people as Bill Ayres and Rashid Khalidi certainly make that belief plausible, to our enemies, and to informed Americans.

And when Senator Biden implies that we may not at first glance think Obama's responses to these crises are the correct ones, it suggests that, indeed, they won't be correct - that Obama will willingly accomodate aggressive actions.  By asking his audience to support Barack in his response, Biden seems to be saying that eventually we'll "come around" to Obama's way of thinking.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oh You Poor Dumb SOB.

If I wake up November 5th to an Obama presidency, to Colin Powell and all the Obamanics, I'll feel like uttering the great line from Three Days of the Condor:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Will Attract the Wolves

In light of Joe Biden's assertion Sunday that when Obama is elected the U.S. will within six months face serious international security challenges, Ralph Peters list of these challenges in the New York Post is truly frightening.
Tags: obama   BIDEN  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another "Useful Idiot" Drinks Obama's Cool-Aid

Providing still more evidence of his cluelessness, or downright disingenuousness, Colin Powell claims that McCain's choice of Sarah palin brings the candidate's judgment into question. 

But as for the elephant in the room, Obama's entire life of tight connections to Marxists and anti-American rascists - not a peep.
.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Colin Powell: Deaf, Dumb & Blind

When the Founders, knowing they were risking their lives, fortunes and sacred honor, declared in the world-shaking Declaration of Independence, that all men had unalienable rights, among which were "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", were they including "among" these three the right to a congenial "Tone"?

And somehow I don't recall that the writers of our Constitution claimed that we, the people, wrote that great document "in Order to Form a more Pleasant Tone".

Nevertheless, as with many late-to-the-party, know-nothing, opportunistic, "undecideds", laboring under the weight of their self-importance, Colin Powell felt at this late stage that he just had to endorse Barack Obama and then chide the "Tone" of the McCain Campaign.

Never mind Obama's "tone" when speaking out against protecting born-alive infants.

Never mind Obama's "tone" when belittling rural Americans for "clinging to guns and religion" out of "frustration".

Or for telling Joe Plumber he wants to spread the plumber;'s wealth around.  Or Joe Biden's nasty rhetoric.  Or Jack Murtha's, calling Western Pennsylvania racist and our Marines (once directed by Powell as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) murderers.

Never mind the tone of Obama's supporters threatening lawsuits against people who "tell lies" about Obama.  Never mind the continuing "tone" of BO's associates through all his years.

No, it's a fellow soldier's "tone" he doesn't like.  But it's a soldier who endured far more than Colin Powell ever did.  And who, unlike Powell in the Gulf War, wants America to win.

I always suspected of Powell that he had no center, or even historical knowledge, when it came to a philosophy of government.  Now I know it.

Another RINO.  Another phony.  Another beneficiary of racial preferences biting the hand that feeds him.

Tone deaf, dumb (unfortunately not in the meaning of speechless), and blind ... to the danger of what Obama and an unfettered Democrat Congress will be to the Constitution, our rights, and our freedoms.
 
Pathetic.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Left and Right: Irreconcilable Differences

Glad to see someone just come out and say it, as Dennis Prager does here.
 
There will be no unity in America until either the left or the right wins.  The differences go deep, to the fundamentals of the nation's founding.
 
Enough of this wimpy talk about "my friends across the aisle".  Some of them might be friendly with you at lunch, but they are not the friends of America, who they will not have over for lunch but rather have for dinner.
 
And enough, Senator McCain, of this silly, or at best disingenuous talk of "I respect Barack Obama and his accomplishments".  Please tell us just what those accomplishments are that you "respect"? 

His steadfastness in supporting the killing of born-alive infants?  His channelling of millions to oufits like Acorn for a failed attempt to indoctrinate, er, improve the educaton of our children with anti-Amercan ideas? 

His "organizing" of "communities" to stage in-your-face protests to get themselves money, and get the organizer more personal power and advancement? 

His non-support for Israel?  His willingness to meet unconditionally with some of the world's worst tyrants? 

His writing two books about, well, himself and outlining his non-accomplishments?  

His throwing his grandmother and then his Pastpr/Mentor under the bus? 

His funding whith others money of the hoptal where his wife works that resulted in her getting a huge wage increase of a sort sedonom seen in the "caring industries". 

His not playing the race card by accusing you of playing the race card? 

His big accomplishment of sitting quietly in a pew for twenty years listening to Reverend Wright decry the hated American "white establishment"?  Maybe that would be an accomplishment if Barack had been chained and beaten while being forced to listed to Wright's bilge, as you were forced to do in the Hanoi Hilton.  But Barack volunteered for this "servce" and sood it lik a (new) man.
 
Ah well, maybe we're just to complacent with the good times we've had here in the U.S., largely due to those "permanent things" the left despises.  Maybe we're content that since we have fewer years to live than do our children, and we've worked hard, we can sit back and let the other fellsa  as play at being earnest for awhile. 

We've been spoiled by not having had the experience of those millions upon millions who lived (and more often died rutally) under leftist regimes in the 20th century.  And most of our children, miss-educated by the likes of Bill Ayres, aren't aware of, or don't believe any of it did or even could have happened.
 
As I recollect, probably imperfectly, from Whitaker Chambers' marvelous book Witness, the final battle between left and right will be fought by communists and the ex-communists (Chambers was one); between those who have released the dogs of tyranny and cried havoc, and those who have seen the loss of freedom, sheer terror, and dehumanization, at first hand.
 
Sadly, seeing might truly be our only way to believing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »